Friday, November 30, 2012
The episode is better than the last several episodes. A running theme seemed to be that every guest-actor was going to be guilty of some crime apart from which ever ones tied in to the Dr. Watson sub plot of the moment. At least in this episode you do have some people that aren't guilty of anything. There are also some good moments of Holmes really showing off his deductive skills such as noticing the differences in the picture placements on a wall and how they are positioned in a photograph. Sadly, there are also some clunky scenes just to play off later. Such as his honing his observation and memorization skills by following multiple television shows at a time. Impressive by itself and serves as showing how he is different from the rest of us. But, it becomes a little heavy handed when it becomes an actual plot point later on. Just as when Edelstein talks about loving crossword puzzles, what could have been just a nice little personality quirk instead becomes a central detail. It keeps the show from being a bit more organic and naturally flowing as everything is too plot centric. There is a bit of humor in the teasing of sexual tension between her and Holmes as that was an ongoing theme and subplot of House.
A plus in the show is that it at least is taking some advantage of the format. Liu's Watson is portrayed as being capable and good at what she does and a strong character in the face of Holmes' overbearing. The problem with any adaptation of Sherlock Holmes is the Watson Problem. In the stories, Watson serves a specific purpose. His character can be a little bland as he's the narrator, the reader's eyes to the story and Holmes. Doyle does a good job in delineating Watson's character better than many such narrators, even others written by Doyle. Still, once you develop Holmes for tv, plays, movies, you don't need Watson for that purpose. The camera serves as narrator. Watson needs to be developed fully and equally as a character. There's still no reason for the character to be an Asian female, but they do a good job with her as a character. She shows the required will, intellect and backbone that is needed to make the relationship credible. Likewise, Miller's Holmes allows a bit more vulnerability and humanity to peak through the more frustrating aspects of the character. It's doled out to the viewers a little bit each time, much as we'd get those odd moments and flashes of humanity and humor in the books. What's missing is the sense of joy that Holmes gets from having a problem to solve.
Otherwise, the show is still in shake-down mode. As a mystery procedural it's mediocre. Which would be fine if the characters and various relationships had a little more spark and variety to them instead of flatly serious the whole time. You can have the characters be more serious and one note most of the time if the drama of the crimes and suspects are appropriately strong. It has yet to truly find that balance.